“Michael Fisher’s career in public life gives ample evidence of his hostility to fundamental constitutional rights, including the right to privacy, reproductive freedom, and separation of state and religion.

“NCJW has long been a vigorous defender of a woman’s right to choose abortion. Fisher is virulently anti-choice. The list of anti-choice actions he has taken while serving in various official positions in the state of Pennsylvania is very long. Among other actions, he supported Pennsylvania’s Abortion Control Act, which required anti-abortion counseling, a 24-hour waiting period, and spousal notification for women seeking abortions, as well as reporting requirements for abortion providers. He signed an amicus brief in Stenberg v. Carhart in favor of the Nebraska ban on so-called “partial-birth abortion,” later overturned by the Supreme Court because it failed to include an exception to preserve the health of the woman, imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to choose, and was so broad and vague that it could bar constitutionally protected abortion procedures performed before viability.

“Fisher even opposes treating contraception on the same basis as other medical benefits. He has supported funding public health programs operated by religious groups that refuse to provide family planning services.

“Fisher also opposes longstanding bars against state support of religion. He defends posting the Ten Commandments in public schools and favors publicly funded school vouchers for sectarian schools.

“In February 2003, Fisher was found to have deprived two employees under his supervision of their civil rights and was ordered by a federal district court jury to pay them more than $220,000 in actual and punitive damages. The case will likely head to the same circuit court of appeals to which Fisher has been nominated.

“Fisher has been a tireless campaigner for his views and lacks credibility as an impartial arbiter of the law. He should not be confirmed to a lifetime post as a federal appeals court judge.”